NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation NURS-FPX 6107 Curriculum Design, Development, and Evaluation ​​​​​​​Curriculum Evaluation

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

NURS-FPX 6107 Curriculum Design, Development, and Evaluation

Curriculum Evaluation

This assessment evaluates the Bachelor in Science of Nursing (BSN) curriculum offered by the University of Michigan School of Nursing (U-M SON), following the previous assessments of curriculum overview and course development. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of successful curriculum development through a detailed evaluation. The evaluation is based on the insights gained from previous assessments. Therefore, giving a holistic representation of the BSN curriculum at U-M SON. 

The BSN program is committed to preparing future nursing leaders so that the organization can flourish in the healthcare industry and improve patients’ well-being. This curriculum trains students to address patients’ complex needs and become highly competent to deliver care in all clinical settings. This program combines concepts and clinical practice taught by internationally recognized faculty to develop an all-rounded healthcare workforce. A thorough evaluation of the BSN curriculum will provide a concrete understanding of the program’s credibility and authenticity in health education. 

This assessment covers the importance of ongoing curriculum evaluation and critical criteria for assessing the program. Furthermore, the paper will discuss the importance of pilot testing in curriculum evaluation, followed by various short-term and long-term evaluation processes. Additionally, the paper elaborates on integrating nursing concepts, theories, and best practices to improve curriculum development. Lastly, an appropriate accreditation body for the BSN curriculum is identified, and accreditation criteria are discussed to evaluate the program. 

Importance of Ongoing Curriculum Evaluation

Continuous curriculum evaluation is crucial for educational organizations to ensure their programs are effective, relevant to current practices, and aligned with the evolving goals of education. Nursing curriculum evaluations are imperative to train nursing students to address the shifting healthcare patterns and patients’ needs according to evidence-based best practices. Some key reasons for ongoing evaluation are:

• Adaptation to changing needs: Continuing evaluations permit institutions to modify their program based on evolving population and healthcare needs. With the growing burden of disease patterns and their evolving management, it is imperative to make curriculum changes so that newly graduated healthcare professionals are skilled to address complex challenges and provide comprehensive patient care in clinical areas (Khanna et al., 2021). Moreover, rapid technological advancements require educational organizations to adapt their curriculum delivery methods. This is only possible with ongoing evaluations to gain insights about the changes and integrate those within the program. For instance, the growing need for digitization during the COVID-19 pandemic required organizations to innovate and transform ways so that students receive clinical understanding with actual patients (Kumar et al., 2020). Furthermore, curriculum evaluations also help shape educational programs to meet the diverse obligations of the student body.

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

• Quality improvement: Constant and regular assessments enable educators and organizations to determine the strengths and weaknesses within the curriculum, ensuring its quality improvement. These evaluations identify the loopholes and points where the curriculum is not meeting the benchmarks. These assessments encourage educators to improve quality initiatives (Chicca & Shellenbarger, 2023). To prepare a safe, compassionate, and competent nursing workforce, excellent and credible curriculum content is essential, indirectly resulting in positive patient outcomes and improving healthcare practices. 

• Meeting standards and regulations: Educational institutions are often required to adhere to standards and regulations. Similarly, nursing schools are obliged to integrate educational standards to improve the quality of content, and ongoing evaluations are meaningful (Delva et al., 2019). These evaluations help organizations comply with regulatory standards, make necessary adjustments, improve the quality of education, and retain accreditation 

• Resource Management: Regular evaluations assist in recognizing redundant or outdated content. This allows organizations to optimize resource allocation, prioritizing essential materials and delivery methods that are valuable and contribute most to student learning outcomes.